Do any of the following describe you or a loved one?

  • I am 65 or older.

  • I have a spouse, parent, or other loved one who is 65 or older.

  • I don’t want to ever be a burden on my family.

  • I’m concerned that I do not have enough income to add the cost of long-term care to my monthly bills.

  • I have less than $2 million in liquid assets (cash plus stocks, bonds, or other marketable securities).

  • I don’t have disposable income of $6,000 to $10,000 per month over and above my bills.

  • I don’t want to leave my spouse impoverished by the high cost of long-term care.

  • I don’t know who would make the tough decisions for me, like deciding if I could continue to live and age at home … or need assisted living or skilled nursing care.

  • I don’t know or understand Medicaid rules.

  • I don’t know whether I could ever hope to qualify for Medicaid.

  • I heard one or more of the following about Medicaid:
    – you have to sell or give away everything you have before you can qualify
    – you have to get rid of everything and even then you’re not qualified for five years
    – you and your spouse can only have $2,000 in assets before you can qualify


It’s true. Our population is aging. And as we enjoy the blessings of longer life and more time with our loved ones, we also face increasingly complicated challenges. Fully seventy percent (70%) of Americans age 65 or older will at some point in life need some form of long-term care. It could be home health care, assisted living, or skilled nursing care. Who will make those decisions for you, if you can’t? How will you pay for that care, if you need it? Will the cost of long-term care wipe out my life savings? Leave my spouse destitute? Keep me from leaving a legacy to my children and grandchildren?

Or is there a way to protect my assets and afford the cost of long-term care?


“It is a fact in Texas that the majority of people considering Medicaid are not, without proper planning, qualified under either the Medicaid income limit or the asset limit (or both).

Even so, they cannot afford the cost of nursing care. For these families, an investment in Medicaid planning offers the greatest possible return on investment.”

Joe Breshears
Breshears Law, PLLC

Founder and CEO

As an experienced and trusted elder law attorney, Joe Breshears’ role is to guide clients and their families through those difficult questions – to help you make sense of the conflicting answers you get from neighbors, friends, or co-workers. We help clients assess their circumstances against the financial and other realities of aging; beginning with available options to pay for long-term care.

Long-Term Care Payment Options:

You PayInsurance PaysGovernment Pays

SELF-PAY OPTION

If you can afford to, you can of course pay for the cost of your own care, or that of a loved one. What would it take for you to pay your own healthcare costs? The answer depends on a number of factors, but here is a simple analysis.

Cost of Care. The average cost of care in a skilled nursing home in Texas depends in part on the type of care you need. Memory care, for example, tends to be significantly more expensive. However, the average cost of nursing care in Texas is about $5,200 per month, or $62,400 annually. Nationally, the average cost of nursing care is $7,776 per month – a staggering $93,312 per year.

Income. To self-pay for your care out of your income, without dipping into your savings each month, you will need disposable income of $5,200 to $8,000 per month. That’s over and above your normal cost of living. Money that you can count on coming in, which you currently don’t need to spend to cover other living expenses.

Investment Income. Perhaps you have investments in stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or other marketable securities. In order to generate an additional $6,000 per month of income from investments, you would need to have a total of $1.8 million in investable assets earning 4% per year in net income.

If you don’t have disposable income, or $1.8 million to $2.5 million in investable liquid assets, then click on the Insurance or Government tabs to explore other options.

LONG-TERM CARE INSURANCE

Long-term care insurance has been available in one form or another for decades. As with other insurance, the premium cost depends in part on age, the amount of coverage sought, and health of the applicant.

Traditional LTC Insurance
Traditional long-term care policies paid an agreed-upon amount of dollars per day, after a waiting period of between 30 and 90 days. So a typical policy of this type would provide, for a monthly or annual premium, $100 per day toward the cost of nursing care. Some policies had an inflation protection component that would increase the amount paid per day by 2% to 3% per year, so that the protection increased as the cost of care increased.

The problems with traditional long-term care policies include the fact that they often don’t cover the entire cost of care. For example, the average daily cost of nursing care in Texas is $5,200, or about $174 per day. Coverage of $100 per day may be all that is needed to bridge the gap between your disposable income and the cost of care, but it may not fully cover your shortfall.

Another problem with traditional LTC policies is that it is typically more expensive than other forms of insurance. The additional cost is not only driven by age, but it is driven by the fact that traditional LTC policies created a level of demand for coverage that the insurance companies did not expect. The premiums paid into a traditional LTC policy were wasted if the policy was never used. Those premium dollars were simply gone, “wasted” if not used. So holders of those policies became much more likely to opt for nursing care in order to prevent waste of their premiums.

Life Insurance Based Coverage
In recent years, a new and more affordable type of LTC policy was developed. This new policy provided a death benefit, just like other life insurance policies. Let’s say $500,000 for the purposes of this illustration. But the newer policies also contained an option to accelerate that death benefit over a three to four-year period to cover, among other things, the cost of residential nursing care. The policy would pay out $125,000 per year for four years, for example, making that amount available to pay for your nursing care.

These policies had the advantage that, if the death benefit was not used to cover long-term care costs, the premium dollars were not wasted. The death benefit was still available to pass on to spouse or children, just as with any other life insurance. For the policy owner, then, the availability of the death benefit means that their premium dollars are not wasted if you don’t need nursing care. Those dollars have still provided a death benefit for your beneficiaries.

Medicaid Program Options

Medicaid is a state-administered program, but it is largely funded by the federal government. It is designed to protect the long-term health and support of persons who have insufficient resources to fully provide for themselves. Medicaid programs are complicated – too complicated to be fully addressed here. But perhaps a look at their most basic characteristics will be helpful to you; among other reasons, to help you prepare to discuss your life care plans with an elder law attorney.

MEDICAID BASICS

Qualification is Based on Need

Not everyone qualifies for Medicaid. For example, when it comes to long-term nursing care benefits, there are three separate criteria. All three must be met in order for you to qualify for benefits.

  • Medical Necessity

  • Income Limit

  • Asset Limit

Medical Necessity

The first requirement for Medicaid is documentation that you or a loved one has medical needs and/or needs with the activities of daily living that can only be provided in a nursing home or assisted living setting. The needs could be in preparation of food, bathing, regulating medication, insertion of medical devices like catheters, or care for bed sores.

Income Limit

The maximum income that a Medicaid applicant in Texas can receive is $2,523 per month for an individual ($5,046 for a married couple). For people with medical need for care, who are over the income limit, Breshears Law can prepare a specialized type of trust to handle the excess income and qualify you for benefits. The trust is technically referred to as a Qualified Income Trust (QIT), but it is commonly known as a “Miller Trust“, named for the family that first obtained approval of this type of income-qualification trust.

The applicant’s excess income is deposited into the Miller Trust and is no longer counted as income for the purpose of income qualification. The excess income is held in the trust and can only be spent for things like unreimbursed medical expenses. At the death of the Medicaid beneficiary, the state can recover some or all of the benefits it paid from the Miller Trust.

Asset Limit

In Texas a Medicaid applicant can only have a total of $2,000 in countable resources. As the word “countable” suggests, certain assets are counted as resources toward the $2,000 limit, but other assets are not counted as resources. Among the assets that are not counted as resources are the following:

  • Your Residential Homestead.
    While your home will not keep you from qualifying for Medicaid, it is not exempt from the state’s Medicaid estate recovery program. Under the estate recovery program, following the death of a Medicaid recipient the state of Texas will attempt to recover up to the entire amount of benefits paid from the deceased’s probate estate. A revocable trust can be created to hold title to the house and prevent it from being lost to the estate recovery program.

  • Contents of Your Home

  • Your Personal Belongings

  • Your Car or Truck

  • A burial plot

Countable resources include bank, credit union, and other deposit accounts, stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and other real estate in which you don’t live. For married couples, the healthy spouse is able to keep 50% of the couple’s community assets, up to a maximum of $137,400. The healthy spouse, called the “community spouse” in Medicaid terms, is able to keep up to $137,400 in assets that will not be counted as a resource available to the applicant spouse.


Is It Even Possible for Me to Qualify for Medicaid?

With what I own, I’ve been told I could ever qualify.

The fact is that most people considering Medicaid are either over the income limit or the asset limit, or both. However, at Breshears Law we use a variety of planning techniques that enable our clients to meet the income and asset limits and become Medicaid eligible. Click on the tabs below to find typical examples of real Medicaid planning cases. The names are obviously changed to protect client confidentiality.

Success Stories in Medicaid Planning

Click on the tabs below to explore three Medicaid planning success stories:

The RichardsThe JohnsonsThe Tylers

The Richards

Jim and Sue Richards, ages 78 and 72 respectively, came to us with the primary concern that, although they were currently healthy, their assets might be lost to a nursing home if either of them needed that level of care. Their assets are listed below.

DESCRIPTIONASSET VALUE
Home$ 150,000
Stocks250,000
Savings152,540
Car17,500
Life Insurance7,500
TOTAL ASSET VALUE$ 577,040

Our Analysis

Analyzing the Richards’ situation, we determined that their stocks, savings, car and life insurance were all at risk to lawsuits, but the more likely risk to their savings would occur if either of them needed skilled nursing care. In that case, even their home would be at risk to loss in the state’s Medicaid estate recovery program. In that program, the state will take assets from the deceased recipient’s probate estate in order to recover some or all of the Medicaid benefits paid to that individual.

Jim and Sue had two options:

  1. Wait for Crisis. They could wait until one of them was in need of nursing care. In that case, we could save approximately half of their assets (about $275,000) using a Medicaid compliant annuity, but the assets used to purchase that annuity could be lost if one of the Richards’ died before the annuity was complete.

    Our recommended option was as follows:
  2. Plan Now. If they chose to plan while they were still healthy, our Medicaid asset protection plan would immediately protect all of their assets from lawsuits. In addition, our plan reduced the risk of loss to a nursing home from $577,040 to an estimated $135,000 – thereby protecting a minimum of $442,000 from being lost to nursing home expenses. If they remained healthy for a five-year period, our plan protected 100% of the Richards’ assets, even from the government for Medicaid purposes.

    In other words, after five years the Richards would be immediately qualified for Medicaid, which would cover their care in a nursing home. The assets protected under our plan could be used to provide types of care, travel, meals out or other activities that would enrich their lives, but which Medicaid would never provide.

The Solution

Our recommended plan utilized two trusts in concert:

The first, a Revocable Trust, was used to hold the Richards’ home and other assets that were exempt from lawsuits and would not be counted as resources for purposes of Medicaid. This trust removed those assets from the Richards’ probate estate, because the trust would ultimately distribute these assets to their children outside of the probate system.

The second trust was an irrevocable Medicaid Asset Protection Trust, which we used to house those assets that were at risk of loss to lawsuits and to being counted as resources for Medicaid purposes. To gain the immediate protection provided by this trust, the Richards needed to give up direct access to the principal of this trust. They would, however, retain the right to all of the income earned by the assets in the asset protection trust.

We also recommended the Richards consider some sort of long-term care insurance policy, to eliminate the risk to the remaining $135,000 that was at risk up to the five-year mark from the date their asset protection trust was funded.

As is usually the case, the most efficient way to maximize the greatest asset protection possible for the Richards was to plan right away, before either of them needed to apply for benefits.

For their part, the Richards were thrilled that a relatively small financial investment now in planning could protect a minimum of $442,000 from being taken. In addition, we were able to free the Richards and their children from the probate legal system. To probate two Wills would have cost the Richards as much as $10,000. If either of the Richards had needed a guardian to manage their estate, without the use of trusts their property was at risk to being managed under a probate court directed guardianship. Eliminating the risk of guardianship resulted in a potential additional savings of $20,000 or more.

The Bottom Line

The Richards realized up to $600,000 in asset and probate cost savings, all for the price of about a month in nursing care.

Jim and Sarah Johnson

Jim and Sarah Johnson, ages 60 and 58 respectively, were concerned about protecting the portfolio of residential real estate they had acquired during their marriage. They were counting on these properties to provide significant income during their retirement, which they planned for two years from the date we began their planning. The Johnsons informed us clearly that they had one primary objective, and that was asset protection.

The Johnsons’ Assets

Home$ 350,000
Investment Real Estate1,200,000
Business250,000
Savings30,000
Household Furnishings45,000
Life Insurance730,000
Cars, Trucks, Boats, & RV’s125,000
TOTAL ASSET VALUE$ 2,730,000

Our Analysis

An asset protection plan made sense to the Johnsons, because they did not want any of their rental properties to be lost to a lawsuit. In fact, they wanted us to do everything in our power to present layers of defense and the most inhospitable target possible to plaintiffs’ lawyers.

The Solution

We created an enhanced Asset Protection Plan for Jim and Sarah. It consisted of two trusts: a Revocable Trust to hold their home, two vehicles, household furnishings, and their savings. In the revocable trust, the Johnsons enhanced their complete control over the assets that were exempt from lawsuits and from Medicaid. They avoided probate and the $10,000 to $15,000 in probate costs we estimated they would face.

We also created a Medicaid Asset Protection Trust (MAPT), which was designed to hold their assets that were at risk, both from litigation and for purposes of Medicaid qualification. Their business, investment real estate, and other motorized vehicles and equipment, were placed into their MAPT. Inside the MAPT, we also created a Series LLC, which would contain a parent LLC and eight subsidiary (series) LLC. Each series LLC held title to a particular residential rental property.

As an added bonus, in five years all of the assets transferred to the MAPT were going to be protected even from being considered for Medicaid qualification purposes.

The Bottom Line

In exchange for a financial investment the equivalent of about a month or two in nursing home care, the Johnsons were thrilled that they were protecting a total of $2.7 million in assets from litigation and, ultimately, from the government as well.

Rob and Laura Tyler

When Rob first contacted us, he was stressed beyond belief. HIs wife of more than 20 years, Laura, was suffering in the end stages of ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig Disease. She was hospitalized and the Tyler’s insurance company was insisting that she be discharged to a skilled nursing facility that possessed the capacity to deal with ALS patients.

At home were the couple’s two teenage sons. Rob didn’t know where to begin, but he knew he needed to act fast. A plan had to be in place within 30 days, the deadline set by their health insurance carrier.

Our Analysis

When we received Rob’s asset list our attention quickly turned to the Medicaid rules that are designed to prevent impoverishing a healthy spouse. Every well spouse is entitled to a “Community Spouse Resource Allowance (CSRA)”.

In other words, a healthy spouse (like Rob) was entitled to keep more assets , even if the ownership of those assets had to be transferred from the spouse in need. The CSRA value for 2021 was $130,380.00 in total assets that could be held in Rob’s name without counting as resources against Laura.

Here Were the Tylers’ Assets:

DescriptionAsset Value
Homestead Real Estate$ 102,950
Vacant Lot5,000
Cash1,950
Savings60,000
Retirement (Rob’s)75,000
Two vehicles33,000
TOTAL VALUE$ 277,900
Less the Adjustment for the CSRA(130,380)
EXCESS ASSETS PRIOR TO PLANNING$ 147,520

The Solution

First, we were able to eliminate the value of certain assets that, under the rules governing a community spouse’s resources, Rob benefitted from the following:

  • The couple’s home did not count toward the CSRA
  • Neither did their vehicles count
  • The vacant lot could be placed on the market and, whether it sold or not, would not count as a resource

Removing those assets from the CSRA calculations, and deducting his attorney’s fees, left Rob with a CSRA under the rules of approximately $ 128,500, just under the CSRA limit.

The Bottom Line

Laura was qualified to apply for Medicaid, and Rob was left in charge of $272,900 in assets without losing a single thing he and Laura wanted to keep. In addition, their assets were removed from the probate system, an additional savings of at least $10,000 and, if Laura would have needed a guardian (in the event of Rob’s death), additional savings of $30,000 or more.

Request a Free Consultation